At a June 15, 2024 fundraising appearance, Biden noted that “the next president is likely to have two new Supreme Court nominees.” Claiming that former president Trump’s appointees had been “very negative in terms of the rights of individuals,” Biden warned that if Trump were to be elected in November, he would “appoint two more flying flags upside down.” “The Supreme Court has never been as out of kilter as it is today,” Biden added, identifying a number of rights (such as access to contraception, in-vitro fertilization, abortion, and same-sex marriage) that would allegedly be threatened by a Trump presidency.

● Elizabeth Warren Rejects Supreme Court’s Abortion Decision & Calls for End of Filibuster

During a July 17, 2024 appearance on ABC’s The View, Warren stated that it was vital for Democrats to win majorities in both the House and Senate, so as to empower Senate Democrats to eliminate the filibuster rule and push through their legislative agendas without impediment. Said the senator: “So, we can make Roe v. Wade the law of the land, we got to have a majority in the house, skinny majority and can take a skinny majority in the Senate. I’ll take 50, and a Democrat in the White House. We have those three things, we will suspend the filibuster, we have the votes for that on Roe v. Wade. First vote Democrats will take in the Senate, first substantive vote, is to make Roe v. Wade law of the land again in America.”

● Biden Calls for Changes to the Supreme Court

On July 29, 2024, Breitbart.com reported:

“President Joe Biden has unveiled a long-awaited proposal for changes at the U.S. Supreme Court …

“’I have great respect for our institutions and separation of powers,’ Biden argues in a Washington Post op-ed published Monday. ‘What is happening now is not normal, and it undermines the public’s confidence in the court’s decisions, including those impacting personal freedoms. We now stand in a breach.’ […]

“Biden is calling … on Congress to pass a constitutional amendment reversing the Supreme Court’s recent landmark immunity ruling that determined former presidents have broad immunity from prosecution.”

● Schumer Tries to Reverse the Supreme Court’s Presidential Immunity Decision

Senator Charles Schumer objected to the Supreme Court’s July 1, 2024 ruling that U.S. presidents have broad immunity from criminal prosecution for actions they take as part of their official duties — a ruling that cast doubt on the constitutionality of the Biden Justice Department’s prosecution of Donald Trump for his efforts in 2020 to challenge the results of that year’s presidential election. On August 1, 2024, Schumer, in an attempt to invalidate and overturn the Court’s decision, introduced the “No Kings Act.” ”Given the dangerous and consequential implications of the court’s ruling,” said Schumer, “legislation would be the fastest and most efficient method to correcting the grave precedent the Trump ruling presented.” Schumer’s Senate bill had more than two dozen Democratic cosponsors.