David Scott

David Scott

: Photo from Wikimedia Commons / Author of Photo: Office of United States Rep. David Scott


* Democratic U.S. congressman from Georgia
* Member of the Congressional Black Caucus
* Cited for corruption by Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington
* Opposes Voter ID laws

Born on June 27, 1945 in Aynor, South Carolina, David Scott earned a BA from Florida A&M University in 1967 and an MBA from the Wharton School of Finance in 1969. He is the brother-in-law of baseball legend Hank Aaron. From 1985-93, Scott hosted the radio program Coors Inside Black America! He also spent a number of years as the owner and CEO of the Atlanta-based Dayn-Mark Advertising Agency, which specialized in creating, producing, and placing radio, television, and print ads.

Scott launched a political career in 1974 when he began an eight-year stint as a Democrat in the Georgia State House of Representatives. He then served in the Georgia State Senate from 1983-2002, and since 2003 he has represented Georgia’s 13th Congressional District in the U.S. House, where he is a member of the Congressional Black Caucus.

During his years in Congress, Scott has earned a reputation for corruption. In September 2007, the left-leaning Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington (CREW) filed a complaint with the Justice Department, asking it to investigate whether Scott had violated federal tax laws as well as statutes prohibiting the use of official government resources (including congressional staffers) for campaign-related activities. Specifically:

  • Beginning in 1998, Scott’s agency, Dayn-Mark Advertising, failed to pay more than $4,600 that it owed in local and state taxes. In 2003 it began failing to make federal tax payments as well, and by 2007 it owed more than $150,000 in back taxes. During this same general time period, Scott and his wife failed to pay $23,200 in taxes on their home. As of 2007, there were more than 40 tax liens on Scott’s home and business. Notwithstanding all this, the Scotts’ stock holdings grew during these years from $5,000 to over $65,000, and they purchased a Washington, DC home worth more than $700,000.
  • In July 2007, congressional staffer Robert Merrill alleged that Scott had illegally assigned him and other staff members to work on his (Scott’s) re-election campaign—often during government office hours, and frequently with the use of government equipment. On other occasions, said Merill, Scott had directed his staffers to perform this work from the offices of Dayn-Mark Advertising, again during official government hours. All such activities are in violation of federal laws that: (a) prohibit congressional representatives from soliciting political contributions (whether in the form of money, gifts, or services) from their staff, and (b) forbid the use of taxpayer dollars for campaigning purposes rather than official government business.
  • Between 2002 and 2007, Rep. Scott’s campaign committee disbursed some $715,000 to the congressman, his family members, and his business. This included the funneling of nearly $99,000 to Rep. Scott himself; more than $124,000 to his wife, two daughters, and son-in-law; and over $491,000 to Dayn-Mark Advertising and its employees. “While such payments are not in themselves illegal,” said CREW, “it is notable that [they] became larger and more frequent in 2003, around the time Rep. Scott was falling behind on his taxes.”

As a result of all these matters, CREW in 2007 named Scott as one of the 18 most corrupt members of the House of Representatives.

Scott has been an outspoken opponent of Voter ID laws, which he says “cause undue burdens on many populations, particularly the elderly, disabled, minority, students, low-income and rural.” He denounced one such statute—the Federal Election Integrity Act of 2006—as a “dastardly,” “un-American,” “unconstitutional,” “shameless,” and “divisive” attempt by Republicans to “target certain voters” with a “modern-day poll tax” designed “to limit the right to vote.”

At an August 2009 town hall meeting that Scott organized in his home district, a local physician, Dr. Brian Hill, politely asked the congressman why he had expressed support for a government-run healthcare system, in light of how that same model had already failed miserably in Massachusetts. In response, Scott yelled at Hill and accused him of having come from outside the district in order to “hijac[k]” the meeting. Moreover, Scott told Hill that he should have had “the decency” to call the congressman’s office and “set up for a meeting” to discuss the issue privately rather than in the town-hall forum. But in fact Dr. Hill—who was not a Republican and was actually a resident of Scott’s district—had called the congressman’s office numerous times and gotten no response.

In September 2009, Scott charged that many critics of President Barack Obama were motivated chiefly by racism. According to a McClatchy news report, the congressman “said that the racial undercurrent against Obama has been the least discussed aspect of his presidency.”

That same month, when the House of Representatives voted by a 345-75 margin to defund the notoriously corrupt community organization ACORN, Scott was one of the 75—all Democrats—who voted to continue funding the group.

During the partial (17%) shutdown of the federal government in October 2013—which occurred as a result of President Obama and the Republican-led Congress being unable to agree on new spending levels in the federal budget—Scott blamed Republicans for the impasse and said: “Your hate for this president is coming before the love of this country, because if you love this country you would not be closing it down.”

At a February 2015 House Energy and Commerce Committee hearing on the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP), Scott dismissed Republican claims that the program was rife with fraud. “Where are examples of the fraud?” he demanded. “Where are the examples of the abuse?… I can’t find any answers on that.” Strongly opposed to suggestions that SNAP’s funding should be reduced, Scott emphasized that the program served as a vital counterbalance to America’s “policy” of imprisoning men—particularly black men—who otherwise could have been their families’ breadwinners. “[T]he situation regarding employment and jobs, poverty, all of that,” he said, “… has been structured into our economic, social policy over the last quarter-century. Our policy of sending so many of our young eligible fathers to prison. Millions…. These are providers who are not there. This is why we have so many single female head of households…. [W]e’ve got to correct some of these things first.”

When the Daily Caller in February 2018 contacted Scott and a number of his fellow Congressional Black Caucus members to ask if they would be willing to publicly denounce the notorious Nation of Islam leader Louis Farrakhan, Scott was one of 20 who declined not only to denounce him, but also to issue any comment at all regarding his infamous anti-Semitic, anti-white rhetoric.

For an overview of Scott’s voting record on a range of key issues during his years in Congress, click here.

Further Reading: “David Scott” (Votesmart.orgLegis.Ga.gov); CREW Complaint Against Rep. David Scott (CREW, 9-20-2007); “Congressman David Scott Condemns Republican Voter ID Bill” (9-20-2006); “Democratic Congressman: We Need Food Stamps Because So Many Fathers Are in jail” (Daily Caller, 2-25-2015); “Black Caucus Members Refuse to Denounce Hate Group Leader Louis Farrakhan” (Daily Caller, 2-7-2018).

© Copyright 2024, DiscoverTheNetworks.org