Libertarianism is a political philosophy which maintains
that each person is the rightful owner of his own life and property, and, as such, that he is free to do as he wishes with those possessions -- provided that he does not harm the person or property of another. In this sense, libertarianism combines liberty (the freedom to live life peacefully in any way one chooses), responsibility (the prohibition against
the use of force against others, except in defense), and tolerance
(honoring and respecting the peaceful choices of others).
Strictly speaking, libertarianism is neither a uniformly "left-wing" nor
a “right-wing” doctrine. On social issues, it tends to be liberal, opposing laws that
restrict consensual and private sexual relationships between adults
(homosexuality, non-marital sex, prostitution, etc.), laws that restrict
drug use, laws that impose religious views or practices on
individuals, and compulsory military service. On economic issues, by contrast, libertarianism tends to be "conservative" -- favoring low taxes and free markets. With regard to social and economic issues alike, libertarianism consistently advocates limited government intervention in the private sphere.
Below is an overview of the libertarian positions vis a vis various social, political, and economic issues of import:
Criminal Justice: Government
has a legitimate function to protect citizens and their property from
harm caused by others, and aggressors should be required to
compensate their victims as much as possible. But so-called "victimless" crimes -- drug use, prostitution, gambling -- should not be punished.
Taxes: The main
problem with taxation is that the government has undertaken too may
illegitimate programs and must take money from productive citizens
in order to fund them. Taxation steals
wealth from productive citizens in order to benefit the preferred
programs and constituencies of the governing class. By adding a
bureaucratic “middle man,” the government ensures it cannot do
any task as efficiently or as cheaply as the free market. People
freely pay for the products and services they think are necessary in
their private lives. If given the opportunity to decide which government programs merit their financial backing, they would continue to fund those that they view as necessary and proper. Conversely, programs that are neither needed nor wanted would go unfunded and thus would wither on the proverbial vine. There is no
legitimate reason why citizens should pay for programs they neither benefit from nor support.
and Medicaid should be abolished. Healthcare can be taken care
of more effectively and efficiently in the free marketplace.
Government regulation and licensing unnecessarily inflate the cost of
services and limit access to them. Healthcare will always have
a cost, and that cost will always continue to rise as long as
arbitrary regulations place undue burdens on pharmaceutical companies
and healthcare providers. To ensure efficient services in this sector, healthcare and health
insurance should not be constrained by state boundaries.
Environment and Energy: An increase in private-property rights would result in a cleaner environment. Federal agencies like the
EPA should be abolished. The free market offers quicker, more
effective ways to clean the environment.
Business and Economy: Free
markets allow for competition that quickly increases the quality and
availability of useful products while decreasing their costs and
correcting any negative corporate practices. Any
government regulation beyond enforcing property rights and contract
law is illegitimate and dangerous. Such policies either
unfairly benefit one company over another or stifle the innovations
that drive progress.
Compulsory education is both ineffective and unneeded. Public schools force parents into compromising the values and
ideas they want their children to learn. These schools are
sterile institutions that are required to focus more on standardizing
education to the lowest possible denominator, than on
equipping children with the skills they need in order to become productive citizens. Even when limited choice and competition have been
introduced into the education system – like voucher systems for
inner-city schools – students learn more and perform better than
their counterparts in public schools.
Foreign Policy and National Security: A
non-aggressive, isolationist stance (as outlined by George
Washington) is the appropriate role of the state. This includes
not engaging with international bodies (like the United Nations)
that threaten America's national sovereignty. Raising
a military for national defense is a valid function of the federal
government, but that military must be manned solely with volunteers and should only
be used for defensive purposes. Invasive, aggressive military
encounters as well as nation-building campaigns are
Freedom of Speech: The
marketplace of ideas benefits from the same forces and rules that
propel the economic free market. Competition of ideas helps refine and polish the best concepts
while phasing out bad ideas. The
First Amendment must be aggressively defended, and any restrictions
on speech -- however offensive -- that does not cause material harm to others must be
Gun Rights: The
right to keep and bear arms is
essential for a free, democratic society. Private citizens need guns to protect themselves, their families, and their
property from dangerous citizens or, more importantly, from a tyrannical
are private property and should not be subject to any more regulation than any other type of property. People who use guns to
unjustly damage someone else or their property should be punished to the full
extent of the law, but they should not be subject to prior
Social Security: The best
way to ensure that the elderly are taken care of later in life is by
letting them control their own retirement savings. The current Social
Security system needs to be privatized so that private individuals
can get the low costs, and high benefits, of an unregulated and free
Trade and Globalization: National borders
should not limit the ability of free peoples to conduct business with one another. In both
migration and trade, governments have no legitimate right to
regulate or tax peaceful interactions, which are the cornerstones of free markets.
is a controversial issue on which libertarians often disagree. Many libertarians argue that government-defined borders are
unnecessary; that free people should be allowed to move
freely in search of a market for their skills, so long as they do not violate anyone else’s property
rights through trespass. Other
libertarians believe that the definition and protection of a nation's borders is one of the chief
responsibilities of a federal government.
Libertarians are also somewhat divided on the issue of abortion. Some, like Libertarians for Life founder Doris Gordon, believe that abortion
is "anti-libertarian" and constitutes "a deadly attack against helpless
children" who are "human beings" endowed with "the equal,
unalienable right to life from the first moment they exist." Others,
like Chapman University professor Tibor Machan, contend that "the principle"
behind Roe v. Wade "is sound" because "a
human being only exists once the cerebral cortex has emerged in
the human fetus." "Prior to this," adds Machan, "only a potential human being exists,
and killing it, while possibly objectionable, is not homicide."
Major Resource: Libertarianism.com