DTN.ORG Home DTN.ORG User's Guide Search DTN.ORG Complete Database Contact DTN.ORG Officials Moonbat Central


A campaign to swiftly and permanently shut down the Guantanamo Bay detention center began in earnest in late 2001. The individual most responsible for launching this initiative was Michael Ratner, president of the Center for Constitutional Rights. Ratner recalls:

“The President [George W. Bush] had just issued a military order saying he had the power to indefinitely detain any non-citizen who he believed was involved in international terrorism. The idea that you could pick up people anywhere in the world and hold them forever without a trial is outrageous. We at [CCR] decided that we would represent the first people who were detained under that military order. In early January 2002, we got authority to represent David Hicks. … I started personally representing the [Guantanamo detainees] in the Supreme Court … Once we won in the Supreme Court case [see Rasul v. Bush, below], we got authorizations from family members to represent about 100 detainees.”

In 2002, Ratner and CCR filed habeas corpus petitions on behalf of a number of suspected Islamic terrorists. These petitions included, most notably, Habib v. Bush and Rasul v. Bush, both of which challenged the Bush administration’s contention that because the Guantanamo prison camp was located outside of U.S. jurisdiction, its inhabitants were not entitled to access American courts. CCR later combined both cases under Rasul v. Bush, which was heard by the U.S. Supreme Court in April 2004, and won an important ruling in that case on June 28, 2004. This CCR victory ultimately paved the way for the organization and its attorneys to gain direct access to the Guantanamo detainees. It also emboldened numerous law firms across the United States to lend their assistance to Ratner’s cause. 
Also in 2004, Ratner went to the United Nations with British actor Corin Redgrave, who chairs the Guantanamo Human Rights Commission, and demanded the immediate closure of the detention center. 
Other leftist organizations followed the lead of Ratner and CCR in condemning Guantanamo. These critics objected to America's use of an offshore prison, and to the unclear legal status of its detainees (who were classified as "illegal combatants" not entitled to Geneva Convention protections, rather than as prisoners-of-war or common criminals). The critics also contended that the detainees should be entitled to the protection of the constitutionally guaranteed civil rights given to prisoners incarcerated within the United States.


Gitmo Legal: Why Are Top-Notch Law Firms Aiding Gitmo Detainees?
By Deroy Murdock
January 25, 2006

The Man Behind the Attack on Guantanamo
By Rocco DiPippo
June 16, 2005


American Civil Liberties Union
Amnesty International
Bill of Rights Defense Committee
Center for Constitutional Rights
Code Pink for Peace
Cornell Forum for Justice and Peace
Global Exchange
Guantanamo Human Rights Commission
Human Rights Watch
Human Rights First
International Action Center
International ANSWER
Middle East Studies Association
National Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers
National Council of Churches
National Lawyers Guild
Not In Our Name
Open Society Institute
Peace Majority
Refuse & Resist!
September 11th Families For Peaceful Tomorrows
Solidarity USA
United For Peace and Justice
Women Against Military Madness
World Can't Wait

Michael Avery
Laurie Brand
Thomas Castellano 
Hillary Clinton
Richard Durbin
Robert Edgar
Peter Kirstein
Patrick Leahy
Joseph Onek
Deborah Pearlstein
Harold Pinter
Michael Ratner
Corin Redgrave
Vanessa Redgrave
Les Roberts
Anthony Romero
Barbara Schatz
William Schulz
John Shattuck
George Soros


Click here to view a sample Profile.

Since Feb 14, 2005 --Hits: 61,630,061 --Visitors: 7,024,052

Copyright 2003-2015 : DiscoverTheNetworks.org