See also: Law
Students for Reproductive Justice
Born
in 1981,
Sandra
Fluke graduated from Cornell University in 2003 with bachelor's
degrees
in (a) Policy Analysis & Management, and (b) Feminist, Gender, &
Sexuality Studies. She subsequently worked
with the New York City-based Sanctuary for Families, which provides
services
for victims of domestic violence and sex trafficking. Fluke also
interned with the NOW
Legal Defense and Education Fund and a number of other organizations
dealing with those two issues.
Prior to commencing her legal
studies at Georgetown Law School in 2009, Fluke
researched the Jesuit university's health plans for students and
found, to her dismay, that they did not cover birth control,
abortifacients, or medical abortion procedures. She then enrolled
at
Georgetown and spent the next three years lobbying the school's
administration to change its policy on the issue. Also during her
stay at Georgetown, Fluke
worked
as
development editor of the Journal
of Gender and the Law;
served as president of Law
Students for Reproductive Justice; was vice president of the
Women’s Legal Alliance; and became
affiliated
with Amnesty
International, the National
Lawyers Guild, and the Georgetown Democrats.
Some congressional Democrats
invited
Fluke to speak at a February 16, 2012 hearing on the
constitutionality of the “Obamacare”
mandate
requiring religiously affiliated hospitals, schools, charities, and other health
and social-service agencies to provide “free” abortifacient
pills, sterilizations, and contraception on demand in their insurance
plans—even
if doing so violated their own moral codes and the teachings of their
churches.
But Rep. Darrell Issa (R-California), who chaired the hearing, did
not permit Fluke to speak, on grounds that Democrats had submitted
her name so late as to leave insufficient time for committee members to vet the woman's credentials. Fluke stayed for the first few
moments of the hearing, during which a representative of the U.S.
Conference of Catholic Bishops spoke, and then walked out in protest
along with the Democratic women who sat on the committee.
Rep.
Carolyn Maloney (D-NY) continued to push
for Fluke to testify before a congressional panel.[1] As
a result of the persistence of Maloney and House Minority Leader Nancy
Pelosi, Fluke testified
before an unofficial congressional hearing led
by Pelosi on February
23, 2012.
Identifying
herself as “an
American woman who uses contraceptives,” Fluke
lamented
that many women employed by religiously affiliated entities had
“suffered financial, emotional, and medical burdens because of this
lack of contraceptive coverage”; that “without insurance
coverage, contraception can cost a woman over $3,000 during law
school” (a claim that was factually untrue); that “forty percent of female students at Georgetown
Law report struggling financially as a result of this policy”; and
that “this policy communicates to female students that our school
doesn’t understand our needs.”
Six days later, radio host Rush
Limbaugh semi-humorously disparaged
Fluke on his program as a “slut” and a “prostitute” who “is
having so much sex she can't afford contraception,” and who “wants
you and me and the taxpayers to pay her to have sex.” After
Limbaugh's comments, President
Barack
Obama, seeing an opportunity to appeal to women voters, called
Fluke to express
his support for her. According to Fluke, the President
“thanked me for helping to amplify the voices of women across the
country ... Beyond that, he also just wanted to express concern and
make sure that I was okay, which I thought was very kind and I
assured him I was.”
On March 3,
Limbaugh posted a statement online in which
he publicly
apologized
to Fluke for his “insulting word choices.” Appearing on ABC's The
View
two days later, Fluke said
that Limbaugh's apology was insufficient. Limbaugh then apologized
again,
saying he had “acted too much like the leftists who despise me.”
Fox News host Bill O’Reilly
reasoned
that the “Sandra
Fluke contraception controversy was manufactured to divert attention
away from the Obama administration’s disastrous decision to force
[Catholic]
organizations to provide insurance coverage for birth control and the
‘morning after’
pill.”
Soon
after the controversy had arisen, SKDKnickerbocker,
a public-relations agency whose managing
director is former White House communications director Anita
Dunn, began representing
Fluke.
In addition to her views on insurance coverage
for contraception and abortifacients, Fluke also believes
that health insurance policies should be required—on
pain of legal action—to
pay for sex-change operations. A Georgetown
Journal of Gender and the Law
article which Fluke co-edited with Karen Hu lamented that because of
widespread “ignorance and bias against transgender persons,”
individuals “wishing to undergo the gender reassignment process
frequently face heterosexist employer health insurance policies that
label the surgery as cosmetic or medically unnecessary and therefore
uncovered.”
On March 20, 2012, Fluke was a guest speaker—along with DNC chair Debbie Wasserman Schultz and National Council of Negro
Women executive director Avis
Jones-DeWeever—at a Women’s History Month forum organized by Eleanor Holmes Norton in Washington, DC.
In a February 2013 interview with MSNBC, Fluke derided employers who have religious objections to providing birth-control coverage in their employee health-insurance plans: “Now if you take a step back and think about that, that’s—you know, you work at a restaurant, you work at a store, and your boss is able to deny you leukemia coverage, or contraception coverage, or blood transfusions, or any number of medical concerns that someone might have a religious objection to. So the folks who are still objecting have some very extreme ideas about religious freedom and employee healthcare in this country.”
NOTE:
[1] Rep. Maloney had ties
to a progressive pollster, Celinda Lake, whose firm—Lake
Research—had
recently done work
for both Maloney and House
Minority Leader Nancy
Pelosi. Lake also had conducted extensive polling which
led her to conclude
that if Republican opposition to insurance coverage for birth control
could be framed as a “women's rights” issue, Democrats could add
significantly to their political support from female voters.
For additional information on Sandra Fluke, click here.