Soros Operatives Infiltrate State Department, CIA
Those who get their news from Big Media probably have no idea why President Bush is conducting a major shakeup of the State Department and CIA. Here's a little background.
Two years ago, a long-simmering bureaucratic feud escalated into open warfare between the Defense Department, which is loyal to Bush, and powerful factions within the CIA and State Department whose loyalties lie elsewhere. Some of these disloyal elements may be under the influence of George Soros' Shadow Party, according to an article in the GIS/Defense & Foreign Affairs Daily of June 30, 2003. DFAD editor Gregory R. Copley writes:
"Senior bureaucrats in the US Department of State and the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) have begun bringing their "war" with the Department of Defense into the open, strenuously advising foreign leaders to avoid meetings with key US Defense officials. … Many State and CIA officials retain their loyalty to the former US Administration of Democratic Pres. William Clinton and some still owed their positions to the even earlier Administration of (Democrat) Pres. Jimmy Carter. As a result, these officials have been attempting at all levels to block what they perceive to be incentives from the Pentagon or the White House of Pres. George W. Bush. …The "Clinton/Soros line" – what a provocative turn of phrase. We at Moonbat Central extend our best wishes to Ambassador John D. Negroponte in his new role as National Director of Intelligence (NDI), as well as to CIA Director Porter J. Goss and Secretary of State Condoleeza Rice. It sounds as if the three of you face a much tougher job than most Americans realize. Oh, and… do watch your backs. We need you.
"One African official commented on June 27, 2003, to GIS/Defense & Foreign Affairs Daily: `We don't know what is going on in Washington any more. Who do we believe? The US Ambassador? The State Department officials in Washington? The CIA? The Pentagon?' He added: `Some of the State Department officials we speak to seem to have more against President Bush than they do against Osama bin Laden.' …
"Several leaders in the Balkans and Africa have told GIS in June 2003 that they now felt that if they showed any support for the US Bush Administration they would, in effect, be `punished' by the US missions with which they had to deal in their home countries. One Balkan official said: `It's as though they [the US embassy officials] are waiting for the Clinton Administration to come back. And these [embassy] people seem to be very friendly with the people from the [leftist US-based, Hungarian-born businessman] George Soros NGOs. So when we see George Soros attacking Pres. Bush, it becomes very confusing. Is Washington aware of what is going on, here on the ground?'
"Washington sources also told GIS that the State Dept., and Secretary of State [Colin] Powell, were determined to thwart any movement of US forces worldwide, or to revisit and correct the history `written during the Clinton Administration.' One source said that any attempt to demonstrate that the Clinton Administration had manipulated intelligence in the Balkans, for example, in order to attack Yugoslavia would open some US officials up to legal attacks. In this regard, the US broadcasting network Radio Free Europe/Radio Liberty (RFE/RL) also perpetuated what officials in the Balkans called `the Clinton/Soros line,' in attempting to legitimize the actions of the former Clinton Administration."
4 Comments:
There is an old joke about needing an American desk in the State Department.
Another story is that George Scultz took out a globe and asked employees to point to the country they represent. Allegedly each and every one pointed to the nation they worked in. Schultz corrected the employees and pointed to the USA.
The problems in the State Department and CIA predate Carter.
The classless critics were having a lot of fun over Dr. Rice's "dominatrix" outfit recently. Apparently she has reason to wear it. I'll chip in for a bigger whip. Give 'em hell, Madam Secretary!
This is the best you can do? This is almost tinfoil hat material. Is it the CIA's official job to be a White House toady? Of course not. It is no government agency's job to prostrate itself before the sitting president, but that is exactly what Bush wants out of all arms of government: complete submission. If you're mad that many CIA staffers seem to have preferred working under Clinton than under Bush, then perhaps you should investigate why that is instead of hatching bizarre conspiracy theories.
It's hardly an uncommon refrain that the Clinton administration--which I neither liked nor disliked--did a much better job dealing with Al Qaida. By all factual accounts, it did do better. Bush is shaking up the CIA because there are too many CIA people not toeing the Bush party line. I have far less confidence in the ability of a CIA that has been brought to heel and to support Bush's policies no matter what than I do in the ability of a CIA that is allowed to function independent of political games.
Dear "Anonymous":
Our reader comments function is currently configured to prevent people like you from posting anonymously, without first registering, creating a reader profile page and selecting a screenname.
How did you manage to circumvent our controls? And why?
Post a Comment
<< Home