Site Search: WWW DTN

Thursday, March 17, 2005

End the Illegal Occupations!

So let us see if we have this straight. The anti-Zionists claim that the Jews have no right to the land of Israel because before Israel was re-created in 1948, it had been almost 1900 years since the last time that the Jews exercised sovereignty over the Land of Israel (though actually Jews held sovereignty there briefly in later periods). And the anti-Zionists claim that it is absurd to argue that anyone still has rights to land that was last under their sovereignty 1900 years ago.

And on what basis do they argue that the Arabs have some legitimate claim to these same lands? On the basis of the claim that the Arabs last exercised sovereignty over that land 1000 years ago. Yes, that was the last time "Palestine" was under Arab sovereignty, and even then there was no Palestinian state (just a province of Syria). So 1900-year-old-claims are inadmissible. Thousand-year-old claims trump them and are indisputable.

The anti-Zionists say the thousand-year-old Arab claim is legitimate because it is more recent than the Jewish claim. But if national claims to lands become more legitimate when they are more recent, then surely the most legitimate of all is that of the Jews of Israel to the lands of Israel, because it is the most recent!

The other claim by the anti-Zionists is that Jews have no rights to the lands of Israel (historic Palestine) because they moved there from some other places. The claim would be absurd enough even if we were to ignore that fact that most "Palestinian Arabs" also moved to Palestine from neighboring countries, starting in the late nineteenth century. But more generally, does the fact that a people moves from one locality to another deprive it of its claims to legitimate sovereignty in its new abode?

If it does, then it goes without saying that the Americans and Canadians must lead the way and show the Israelis the light, by returning all lands that they seized from the Indians and the Mexicans to their original owners and going back to whence they came. For that matter, the Mexicans of Spanish ancestry also need to leave. The Anglo-Saxons, meaning the English, will be invited to turn the British Isles over to their original Celtic owners, while they return to their own ancestral Saxon homeland in northern Germany and Denmark.

But that is just a beginning. The Spanish will be called upon to leave the Iberian peninsula that they wrongfully occupy, and return it to the Celtiberians. Similarly the Magyars will go back whence they came and leave Hungary to its true owners. The Australians and New Zealanders obviously will have to end their occupations of lands that do not belong to them. The Thais will leave Thailand. The Bulgarians will return to their Volga homeland and abandon occupied Bulgaria. Anyone speaking Spanish will be expected to end his or her illicit occupation of Latin America. It goes without saying that the French will lose almost all their lands to their rightful owners. The Turks will go back to Mongolia and leave Anatolia altogether, returning it to the Greeks. The Germans will go back to Gotland.

Ah, but that leaves the Arabs. First, all of northern Africa, from Mauritania to Egypt and Sudan, will have to be immediately abandoned by the illegal Arab occupiers and squatters, and returned to their lawful original Berber, Punic, Greek and Vandal owners. Occupied Syria must be released at once from the cruel occupation of the Arab imperialist aggressors. Iraq must be returned to the Assyrians and Chaldeans. Southern Arabia must be returned to the Abyssinians. The Arabs may return control of the central portion of the Arabian peninsula as their homeland. But not the oil fields.

Oh, and the Palestinian infiltrators, usurpers and squatters will of course have to return the lands they are illegally and wrongfully occupying, turning them over to their legal and rightful owners, which would of course be the Jews!


4 Comments:

John Forte said...

It makes me sick to contemplate that the stunningly productive greenhouses in Gaza will have be left to rot, when the Jewish families are forced to leave.

Thu Mar 17, 07:53:44 PM  
Rightminded said...

This post has been removed by the author.

Fri Mar 18, 02:30:46 AM  
Rightminded said...

This post has been removed by the author.

Fri Mar 18, 02:33:42 AM  
Rightminded said...

If in fact the most recent claim of title, always trumps the least recent. Why in the blue blazes did I pay for title insurance for my "most recently purchased" new digs (I just smacked myself in the forehead to wake myself up)?

Also, why have some cash strapped communities, who cannot afford high price lawyers to defend them, knuckle- under to the Native-American-Casino-Owning-Mafiosi?

Why, when a Chief comes with deep pockets, and says, "we will sue you for land rights from whenever, if you do not let us expand, or open a new casino? The community in many cases simply folds, and takes their wagons out of the defensive circle.

MAN, OH MAN, THEY WILL STOOP TO ANYTHING, AND WHATEVER!

Fri Mar 18, 02:36:31 AM  

Post a Comment

<< Home

Copyright 2003-2005 : DiscoverTheNetwork.org