DTN.ORG Home DTN.ORG User's Guide Search DTN.ORG Complete Database Contact DTN.ORG Officials Moonbat Central




Annie E. Casey Foundation: Helping Children Becomes Advocacy for the Welfare State
By David Hogberg
June 29, 2012

Stopping Juvenile Detention: The Casey and Kellogg Foundations Sponsor Policies That Will Increase Criminal Behavior
By Joseph Lawler
February 2010

Going Soft on Juvenile Crime: How the MacArthur and Casey Foundations Distort Youth Offender Policies
By Fred Lucas
May 2013

701 St. Paul Street
Baltimore, MD

Phone :(410) 547-6600
Email :webmail@aecf.org
URL :http://www.aecf.org

Annie E. Casey Foundation's Visual Map

  • Assets: $2,667,088,187 (2011)
  • Grants Received: $5,223,691 (2011)
  • Grants Awarded: $95,149,184 (2011)


Version:1.0 StartHTML:0000000167 EndHTML:0000036744 StartFragment:0000000487 EndFragment:0000036728

The Annie E. Casey Foundation (AECF) was established in 1948 by United Parcel Service (UPS) co-founder Jim Casey (1888-1983), along with his two brothers (George and Harry) and his sister (Marguerite), in honor of their mother, for whom they named the Foundation. Initially devoted to supporting child welfare and long-term foster care, AECF has evolved, over the decades, into an organization emphasizing multiculturalism and race-based programs geared for nonwhite minorities. As David Hogberg of Foundation Watch wrote in 2012, the Casey Foundation “has taken a new direction during the nearly three decades since James Casey’s death.”

It is somewhat difficult to define, with precision, the late Jim Casey's politics. In Greg Niemann's 2007 book
Big Brown: The Untold Story of UPS, the author called Casey “conservative and far from radical.” Yet Niemann also noted that while most of UPS's founders “were primarily political conservatives, they adopted what could be considered today rather radical pro-labor ideas.” And David Hogberg, for his part, fleshes out the portrait of Casey:

“The Pacific Northwest of Jim’s early years had a robust social movement, and Seattle, where the Casey family settled, was already known across the country as a haven for left-wing politics. Activists called for the emancipation of the working class from the 'slave bondage' of capitalism. They wanted the working class in possession of economic power, to control business enterprise without regard to capitalist masters. This is the atmosphere in which Jim Casey matured. Remember, he was always watching. He couldn’t have helped but notice the unrest and reasons underlying the working-class argument. It’s an open question whether James Casey would support the current direction of the Foundation he established.”

AECF today professes a commitment to: (a) “developing a brighter future for millions of children at risk of poor educational, economic, social and health outcomes”; (b) “strengthening families, building stronger communities,... ensuring access to opportunity”; and (c) “influenc[ing] decision makers to invest in strategies based on solid evidence” regarding “what works.”

In practice, the Foundation generally views a greater amount of centralized government control over such domains as the health care services, employment, and personal incomes of American citizens. Thus it makes large numbers of grants to help federal agencies, states, counties, cities and neighborhoods create “more innovative, cost-effective responses to the issues that negatively affect children: poverty, unnecessary disconnection from family, and communities with limited access to opportunity.” As the Capital Research Center puts it: “The groups receiving Casey grants all say they want to help families with children. But what they most have in common is the desire to advocate for more government-sponsored welfare entitlement programs.... [The Foundation] now uses its grant dollars to support organizations that believe the best way to help children and families is to advocate for welfare assistance, job-training programs, public education, and other policies that make use of government mandates and tax dollars.”

To persuade policymakers, program administrators, the news media, and other audiences to support innovations it regards as progressive, AECF spent a good number of years leading a consortium of philanthropies that provided funds to the Urban Institute for a comprehensive, nonpartisan research project called
Assessing the New Federalism, which was initiated as a response to the welfare reforms that President Bill Clinton signed into law in 1996. Between 2000-12, AECF gave at least $17.5 million to this initiative, whose findings confirmed the Casey Foundation's bedrock belief that adequate incomes and childcare arrangements are best ensured by increased government spending and an expansion of federal welfare bureaucracyi.e., a “new social safety net” consisting of both publicly and privately funded programs.

To address the problem of poverty (and its associated ills), the Casey Foundation in 1995 launched a “Jobs Initiative Program” to provide funding and support “for community-based initiatives” (in such fields as construction, healthcare, manufacturing, and teleservices) designed “to help young, low-income workers find meaningful jobs.”

On the premise that the federal government was doing too little to alleviate poverty in America, the Foundation in 2006 identified the “challenge of helping rebuild distressed communities” as its top grant-making priority for the immediate future.

Also in the mid-2000s, AECF oversaw initiatives to increase the pay and lighten the workload of social service employees; to “improve the access of disadvantaged young adults to family-supporting employment”; to provide mental health services and discussion-group forums "for children and families in disadvantaged neighborhoods"; to fund "a wide range of organizations that work directly with disadvantaged children, youth, and families, primarily in Baltimore City"; "to improve housing and social and physical infrastructure"; and to "increase public and private investment in [low-income] neighborhoods."

Among the many hundreds of Casey Foundation grantees are the following: the American Bar Association Fund for Justice and Education; the American Civil Liberties Union Foundation; the Arab American Institute Foundation; the Aspen Institute; ACORN (more than $1.7 million from 2001-09, including $685,000 to ACORN Housing Corporation); the Brennan Center for Justice; the Brookings Institution; the Center for American Progress Action Fund; the Center for Community Change; the Childrens Defense Fund; the Council on FoundationsDemos: A Network for Ideas and Action; the Ella Baker Center for Human Rights; the Independent Media Center; the Institute for Womens Policy Research; the Ms. Foundation for Women; the National Committee for Responsive Philanthropy; the National Council of La Raza; the National Immigration Law Center; National Public Radio; the Neighborhood Funders Group; the New America Foundation; Planned Parenthood; the Public Broadcasting Service; the Public Justice Center; the Rockefeller Family Fund; the Tides Foundation and the Tides Center; and the Urban Institute.

To view a list of additional noteworthy grantees of the Annie E. Casey Foundation, click here.

AECF's grantmaking today has 3 major Areas of Investment:

(1) Child Welfare:

-The Child Welfare Strategy Group provides “strategic consulting and technical assistance” to help child welfare agencies become more effective in “helping children heal and recover from maltreatment.”

-The Jim Casey Youth Opportunities Initiative seeks
particularly through its Success Beyond 18 campaignto help young people nationwide who are in, or are transitioning from, foster care.

-Case Commons aims to build a case-management system designed to help child-welfare agencies compile and analyze information and apply it in the most effective ways. Toward that end, this program has developed
Casebook, a first-of-its-kind tool for the child welfare field.

(2) Juvenile Justice

Since 2005, AECF and and the John D. and Catherine T. MacArthur Foundation have led a highly successful crusade to make the juvenile justice system increasingly lenient
even for the worst offenders. Rejecting the “get-tough-on-crime” approach that helped to dramatically cut crime rates beginning in the 1990s, Casey and MacArthur have: pushed for alternatives to incarceration for youthful offenders; opposed the practice of trying minors as adults; spearheaded the movement to abolish the death penalty for juveniles; and helped to almost entirely eliminate life sentences for young murderers. In addition, these Foundations have developed close relationships with the Obama Justice Department, where their views and strategies are highly influential.

Frowning upon incarceration as a means of motivating youthful offenders to reform their lives, AECF established its Juvenile Detention Alternatives Initiative (JDAI) in 1993 as a pilot project to reduce reliance on the local confinement of court-involved youth. The major objectives were to: “decrease the number of youth unnecessarily or inappropriately detained”; “reduce the number of youth who fail to appear in court or re-offend pending adjudication”; and “redirect public funds towards effective juvenile justice processes and public safety strategies.” Founded on the premise that every stage of the juvenile justice system, from arrest through sentencing, is rife with racial injustice, JDAI says: “Nationwide, minority youth represent two-thirds of detained youth, but only about one-third of the total youth population.... It is impossible to talk about juvenile detention reform without talking about the disproportionate confinement of youth of color.”

Today the JDAI program is operational in 33 states and nearly 300 counties nationwide, where, as the Casey Foundation boasts, it has “dramatically reduc[ed] detention facility populations.” Indeed, JDAI measures its success by the degree to which detention rates of youthful offenders decrease where the program is active
—on the theory that detention tends to turn young people into ever-more hardened criminals.

AECF directs significant funding toward a state-level JDAI model site in New Jersey as well as four local model sites—Bernalillo County (New Mexico), Cook County (Illinois), Multnomah County (Oregon), and Santa Cruz County (California)—that serve as learning laboratories where JDAI can perfect its techniues and practices. Additional Casey funding helps JDAI to: (a) provide training and technical assistance to its sites across the country; (b) host a Helpdesk that serves as a depository for documents related to key issues in juvenile justice; and (c) convene national JDAI conferences on an annual basis, in an effort to advance the movement.

Building on JDAI's work in the field of detention reform, AECF's Reducing Youth Incarceration (RYI) program strives to promote
new state-level policies and practices that reduce the number of youth placed into correctional institutions and other residential facilities. RYI does this by producing an array of issue briefs, policy reports, how-to manuals, and other materials designed to inform policymakers and juvenile justice practitioners.

In 2006 the Casey Foundation issued a widely discussed report titled: “Race Matters: Unequal Opportunity Within Criminal Justice.” This study concluded that the U.S. justice system is rife with “embedded racial inequities” that “work against women and men of color”; “racial stereotyping and discrimination”; “disproportionality at every step of the criminal justice process”; “statutory biases”; “poverty’s interaction with race in criminal defense”; “disproportionate imprisonment”; “differential post-release consequences”; “disparate impact on families and children”; and “disparate impact on neighborhoods.”

AECF and the MacArthur Foundation also co-funded a study titled “Transfer of Juveniles to Adult Court: Effect of a Broad Policy in One Court,” which was critical of trying youth offenders as adults. Published by the U.S. Justice Department in December 2012, this study found that: (a) [T]he majority of youth transferred to adult court who return to their community resume some level of antisocial activity, and many are subsequently arrested or placed in an institutional setting”; and (b) “Youth who associated with more antisocial peers resumed antisocial activity more quickly and were re-arrested more quickly than those who had more positive social relationships. This supports the general contention that juveniles, even serious offenders who are transferred to adult court, are highly susceptible to negative peer influences and outside pressures.”

(3) Kids Count

AECF provides large amounts of funding for the Kids Count Network, a group of state-based child advocacy and research organizations that use data to promote “smart policies” on a variety of issues including child welfare, juvenile justice, education, and economic opportunity. The Network's online KIDS COUNT Data Center features state and local statistics that track the well-being of children
as measured by hundreds of key indicatorsover time and across geographical locations. This website is supplemented by the Foundation’s annual KIDS COUNT Data Book.

Additional areas of AECF funding include:

(A) Work & Economic Opportunity

(a) Work, Education, and Income: AECF invests in groups that seek to expand access to postsecondary education and skills training for adults and youth; builds partnerships with businesses and others to increase career opportunities for low-wage workers and jobseekers; helps families supplement
their income through tax credits and social enterprise and microenterprise models designed to help low-skill adults; and promotes changes in federal and state policies so as to ensure paid family leave for all workers and expanded civil rights (e.g., voting rights) for people with criminal records.

(b) Financial Well Being: AECF funds groups and projects that aim to increase “access to fairly priced, appropriate financial products and services”; protects consumers from “high-cost products and practices that deplete family resources”; and promotes federal and state policies that “support asset building, affordable financial services and consumer protection.”

(c) Center for Working Families: This AECF inititiative provides low-income individuals and families with financial coaching and education; helps them find work in their preferred fields; and helps them take advantage of public benefits like the earned income tax credit.

A highly noteworthy recipient of AECF funding was the Center for American Progress (CAP) Action Fund's “Half In Ten” Poverty Reduction Campaign, which collected some $218,000 from the Casey Foundation in 2010. “Challeng[ing]” America to cut its poverty rate in half by the year 2020, this Campaign’s seminal document was a 2007 CAP report titled “From Poverty to Prosperity: A National Strategy to Cut Poverty in Half,” which was produced by a task force co-chaired by Peter B. Edelman. Other members of the task force included national ACORN president Maude Hurd, AFL-CIO official Linda Chavez-Thompson, and Brookings Institution economist Alice Rivlin. Specifically, the report called for the minimum wage to be raised and then indexed to an hourly rate equivalent to half the national average; an expansion of the Earned Income Tax Credit (EITC) and Child Tax Credit; the enactment of the pro-union Employee Free Choice Act; taxpayer-funded child care assistance for all low-income families; and the reestablishment of federal Youth Opportunity Grants.

Not only did Half In Ten endorse the Edelman task force recommendations; it also lauded President Barack Obama’s expansion of the Food Stamp program; supported Obama's expansion of unemployment insurance eligibility; claimed that a Republican budget proposed by House Budget Chairman Paul Ryan would “harm our most vulnerable citizens”; and rejected a Republican bill designed to prevent welfare dollars from being spent in strip clubs, casinos and liquor stores. Half In Ten director Melissa Boteach described that bill as “yet another instance in the creeping trend of conservatives to demonize the poor.”

According to the Capital Research Center, “The [AECF] grant to Half In Ten illustrates how the Casey Foundation works: it promotes public policy research, cultivates grassroots and elite coalition-building, and develops an effective public relations program: groups and elected officials are urged to 'sign a pledge' committing themselves to the effort. The announced aim is to help the poor, but the practical effect is to fund nonprofit advocacy groups to build support for more government programs.”

(B) Community Change

The Family-centered Community Change program seeks to “integrate often disconnected services for kids and adults” in “high-poverty neighborhoods” located in BuffaloColumbus and San Antonio.

The Civic Sites program pursues similar objectives in Baltimore, where AECF's headquarters are located, and Atlanta, home to UPS.

(C) Evidence-Based Practice

Evidence2Success “helps identify problems and solutions” that have “proven” to be effective at helping children. The program's principal tools include: (a) the Evidence2Success Youth Experience Survey, which provides public agencies and communities with a “big picture” view of how youngsters are doing and the challenges that influence their development; and (b) Blueprints for Healthy Youth Development, which helps to “match” children’s individual strengths and needs with “cost-effective, evidence-based programs designed to help.”

(D) Education

The Campaign for Grade-Level Reading gives parents, schools and communities the latest available resources on “best ideas, research, guides and references” to promote reading proficiency by the end of third grade and to improve “school readiness, attendance and summer learning.” In related campaigns, AECF supports the National Summer Learning Association and Attendance Works, a national and state-level initiative that promotes awareness of the important role that school attendance plays in achieving academic success.

(E) Talent and Leadership Development
The Leadership Development program
uses an approach called “results-based leadership to help professionals in nonprofits and public systems “make positive, measurable change for children and families, whether that means increasing the percentage of children ready to learn in kindergarten or decreasing the time young people spend in juvenile detention.”

The Children and Family Fellowship program is a leadership training initiative for executives from “sectors working to improve outcomes for children, families and communities.” It uses group seminars and individual coaching to give them “the confidence and competence to lead major system reforms and community change initiatives that get results.”

(F) Research and Policy

AECF investments in this area encourage a focus on research and evaluation to determine what ideas and approaches are “most effective for improving the well-being of children and families,” particularly in the areas of family permanence, poverty and opportunity, and community change.

In the area of State and Federal Policy Reform, AECF grants aim to “strengthen decision makers’ capacity to “promote the effective administration of essential safety-net programs proven to lift families out of poverty,” promote the expansion of refundable tax credits for low-income working families, improve access to federal child welfare
benefits, and provide alternatives to youth detention and reduce incarceration. 

For information about past Casey Foundation initiatives, click here.

For additional information about AECF, click here.


http://capitalresearch.org/2012/06/annie-e-casey-foundation-helping-children-becomes-advocacy-for-the-welfare-state/ Since 2000 the Annie E. Casey Foundation has given over $3.3 million in grants to the Alliance for Children & Families. This group, which bills itself as a “membership organization,” provides services to child-centered nonprofits in the U.S. and Canada. The services include grants, web-based seminars (“webinars”) and teleconferences, and professional development assistance. The Alliance has a public policy office in Washington, D.C. Its “2011 Public Policy Agenda,” called for universal health coverage of adults and children, would require states to set Medicaid payment rates at the same level as Medicare, and urged tuition subsidies for students who choose to major in the field of child and adolescent mental health.



(Information on grantees and monetary amounts courtesy of The Foundation Center, GuideStar, ActivistCash, the Capital Research Center and Undue Influence)



Since Feb 14, 2005 --Hits: 61,630,061 --Visitors: 7,024,052

Copyright 2003-2015 : DiscoverTheNetworks.org