Stalin's
Cheerleader
The fellow-traveling of historian Eric Hobsbawm.
by David Evanier
The Weekly Standard
05/19/2003, Volume 008, Issue 35
![]()
Interesting Times
A Twentieth-Century Life
by Eric J. Hobsbawm
Knopf, 250 pp., $30
IN "Interesting Times: A
Twentieth-Century Life," Eric Hobsbawm, the British historian who was
named by the Queen of England in 1998 a Companion of Honor on the
recommendation of Prime Minister Tony Blair, records his love affair with
communism. The marriage lasted from Hobsbawm's coming to political
consciousness in the early 1930s to the collapse of the evil empire in 1991.
And, in truth, Hobsbawm's ardor hasn't really abated, even yet. He writes that
to this day he has "an indulgence and tenderness" toward "the
memory and tradition of the USSR." He cherishes his tattered Communist
party song pamphlets from the Communist rallies of his Berlin days. "The
dream of the October Revolution is still there somewhere inside me."
Interestingly, nowhere except in
writing such autumnal reflections of his salad days does Hobsbawm reveal much
semblance of having spent his life as a human being. As he writes, from
childhood onward, "Human beings did not appear to interest me much, either
singly or collectively; certainly much less than birds." His coldness and
lack of curiosity extends to his entire family; of his sister he writes,
"We had very little in common, . . . and my intellectualism and lack of
interest in the world of people gave me a protection she lacked."
In a recent interview, Hobsbawm
stated that the horrors of the Gulag did not affect his belief as a Communist.
An interviewer asked, "What that comes down to is saying that had the
radiant tomorrow actually been created, the loss of fifteen, twenty million
people might have been justified?" Hobsbawm's answer was
"Yes"--although he granted that the sacrifice of the murdered
millions was "excessive."
Eric Hobsbawm was born in Egypt
in 1917; his Jewish parents moved to Vienna when he was two. Both died during
the depression, and Hobsbawm moved to Berlin in 1931, living with his uncle.
His childhood was marked by these peripatetic moves and the insecurity they
engendered, as well as the rising specter of Hitler. In 1933 his family
regrouped in London, and he joined the Communist party while at King's College
in Cambridge.
"The months in Berlin made
me a lifelong Communist," Hobsbawm says. It was the apocalyptic atmosphere
of the last days of the Weimar Republic in January 1933 that appealed to him,
the clash of Communists and Nazis (when they were not working together), Hitler
taking power, the Reichstag fire, the flaming street posters with images of
violence. He experienced what he defined as the "mass ecstasy" of
marching with his comrades in the freezing cold on dark wintry streets between
shadowy buildings, an experience he defines as akin to sex, "and unlike
the sexual climax, at any rate for men, it can be prolonged for hours."
Hobsbawm began to enjoy the
benefits of Western democracy as soon as he reached England, with a scholarship
to King's College followed by a teaching appointment at Birkbeck College in
London. He makes clear his passionate identification with the Soviet Union,
even his sympathy for the Cambridge spies ("One minor spin-off from 1930's
Communism," he pooh poohs), but his prose glides over most of the horrific
events in the history of communism, including the Hitler-Stalin Pact, which he
disposes of with one mention as "the line-change of the autumn of
1939." Hobsbawm writes that his love of jazz (a subject he coyly refers to
as a passion, but with no real explication) "replaced first love,"
because he was "ashamed" of his physical appearance. But communism
was his only real love. He was struck by Stalin's execrable "Short
History," "which made Marxism so irresistible." Perhaps embedded
in that "love" was a self-hatred that found revenge in supporting one
of the most bestial murder machines in history.
ONE CAN LEARN almost nothing
about the history of communism from Hobsbawm's "Interesting
Times"--nothing about the show trials, the torture and execution of
millions, the Communist betrayal of Spain. Hobsbawm's stunted, euphemistic
language reveals more than he intends. Communists are always good, and
anti-Communists are "dreadful," "hysterical,"
"ill-tempered." Opposition to communism is, in Hobsbawm's words,
"espionage mania" (though he acknowledges Soviet espionage existed,
he seems not to disapprove of it). He admits that the Soviet Union "was a
monstrous all-embracing bureaucracy"--only to add immediately: "The
new society they were building was not a bad society...good people doing an
honest day's work . . . no class distinctions."
Hobsbawm's prose is always at a
distance from reality. He writes of "the hecatombs of the Stalin
era," not torture chambers and concentration camps. An old Hungarian
Communist, Tibor Szamuely, "claimed to have had the usual spell in a camp
during the dictator's final lunacies." Note "claimed," as if
it's probably not true; note "lunacies," which is another glideover.
The Doctors' Plot show trials
had "an anti-Semitic tinge." Hobsbawm writes of Stalin as "a
terrible old man." Does this mean he was nicer when he was young or
middle-aged? That he got grouchy? In the USSR, Hobsbawm writes, there was "almost
paranoiac fear of espionage." Get that "almost." He writes that
he stayed in the party because of the "titanic achievements [of the USSR]
and still with the unlimited potential of socialism"--an unconsciously apt
phrase, considering the fate of the Titanic. The attacks of September 11
led America to decide "implausibly" on a life-and-death struggle, but
they were in truth "certainly no cause for alarm for the globe's only
superpower. . . . Public mouths flooded the western world with froth as hacks
searched for words about the unsayable and unfortunately found them." Who
is the real threat? "The enemies of reason . . . the heirs of fascism . .
. who sit in the governments of India, Israel, and Italy."
THERE IS NO DOUBT that Hobsbawm
has acquired a remarkable worldwide academic cachet as a historian with his
scholarly books, essays, and lectures. He holds many honorary degrees and has
won a bevy of other honors, including membership in the American Academy of
Arts and Sciences. Now, at eighty-two, he is being showered with encomiums.
Hobsbawm explains his success as due to the consolidation of the left in the
academies and the Third World.
But another reason is surely
that many liberals have never come to grips with the fact that Stalin was as
evil as Hitler, and that Soviet socialism was as deadly as Nazism. The New York
literati would not be currently flocking to readings at the KGB Bar on the
Lower East Side of Manhattan--premises once occupied by a Ukrainian branch of
the Communist party--if it were called the Gestapo Bar.
David Evanier is the author of "Red Love," a novel about the Rosenberg case.
© Copyright 2004, News Corporation, Weekly Standard, All
Rights Reserved.