|
|
|
|
Animal Liberation Front: Agendas, Activities, and Worldview By John Perazzo November 28, 2005 The most active extreme animal rights group in America, the Animal Liberation Front (ALF) identifies its main bases of operation as Canada, the United Kingdom, and the United States; all told, it is currently active in about twenty countries worldwide. ALF's self-defined mission is "to effectively allocate resources (time and money) to reduce animal suffering in the world." Toward this end, ALF states that it "carries out direct action against animal abuse in the form of rescuing animals and causing financial loss to animal exploiters, usually through the damage and destruction of property." Counted among these "exploiters" are hunters, fishers, butchers, factory farmers, restaurateurs, and those who use animals to entertain the public (in zoos, circuses, and rodeos). The fur, meat, egg, and dairy industries are also viewed as major offenders, as are scientists and technicians involved in laboratory animal testing. All of these pursuits, charges ALF, "profit from the misery and exploitation of animals." In ALF's estimation, the use of animals as sources of food, clothing, entertainment, or scientific knowledge is immoral and should be prevented by any means necessary. ALF candidly acknowledges that in its quest to force "animal abuse companies" out of business, it takes "illegal actions . . . to bring about animal liberation." Adds ALF, "These are usually one of two things: rescuing animals from laboratories or other places of abuse, or inflicting economic damage on animal abusers." In ALF's lexicon, "rescuing" (which the group also calls "liberating") means stealing, and "inflicting economic damage" means destroying physical property. Because these activities are illegal, ALF activists work anonymously, generally in cells of two to five people but sometimes alone. ALF has no formal hierarchy, central organization, leaders, newsletter, or official membership rolls. "Anyone who carries out direct action according to ALF guidelines," its website explains, "is a member of the ALF." The lone lifestyle stipulation is that in order to be recognized and supported by ALF, an individual must be either a vegetarian or a vegan; meat-eaters, by definition, violate ALF's premise that animals ought not be "exploited" as sources of food. It is believed that in North America and the United Kingdom, ALF's most militant members are young adults from middle-class backgrounds. ALF has its historical roots in the Hunt Saboteurs Association (HSA), an organization whose members try to save animals from hunters by laying false scents and blowing hunting horns to send hunters' hounds running in the wrong direction. Other members disable animal traps and set off smoke bombs to disrupt hunting activities; some go so far as to become human shields, placing themselves between hunters and the animals they are tracking. The precise date of ALF's first American action is impossible to pinpoint, but one of the earliest was a 1979 incident where vandals broke into the New York University Medical School and released (or "liberated") five animals slated for experimental use. During the ensuing years, hundreds of similar "liberations" would take place. Among the animals that ALF activists have released from research facilities are dolphins, dogs, cats, guinea pigs, and monkeys. Also among ALF's notable crimes over the years was a 1992 firebombing at an animal research laboratory at Michigan State University. Animal rights activist Rod Coronado (a former member of the Vancouver-based Sea Shepherd Conservation Society, which sank numerous fishing vessels in an effort to protect marine mammals) was convicted for his role in this incident and served three-and-a-half years in prison. In an interview with a Michigan State University newspaper, a defiant Coronado stated, "I wish I could do it again. I have absolutely no regrets, and I hope the same thing continues." According to the FBI, between 1995 and 2005 ALF committed some 700 criminal acts. These were not limited solely to acts of sabotage, vandalism, and "liberation." In one incident, for example, ALF activists broke into a car belonging to a pharmaceutical executive's wife, stole her credit cards and used them to charge $20,000 in charitable "donations." Following the adage that one success breeds further successes, the Primer advises budding animal-rights activists: "Start small, then move on to bigger things. Even the simplest actions take practice to get right, so try one thing at a time until you've gotten it down. Once you've mastered the small things, use them in combination to really ruin an abusers [sic] day. Think about possibilities of combining breaking windows and paint bombs for instance." "Windows," the Primer explains, "are probably the easiest target available in most situations, yet large windows can cost hundreds, making them an ideal target." For this purpose, the publication recommends the use of glass etching fluid (hydrofluoric acid), a liquid or cream that eats through the surface of glass, as "a quick and relatively safe way to cause some financial damage." It also suggests the simple smashing of windows with rocks, bricks, BB guns, or hammers. Another recommended method is the use of sling shots. These, explains the Primer, "are available in many sporting stores. You may have to patronize a store that sells hunting equipment to find one, but you can always offset this by returning at a later date and smashing their windows in turn." The Primer points out that one advantage of sling shots is that they "can even be effective from moving cars." It adds that the best time to carry out such noise-producing methods of vandalism is a stormy night, when "the lack of visibility and [the] noise of the storm provid[e] excellent cover." The Primer also endorses the use of glass glue, which permanently sticks glass to glass, as an agent of window vandalism: "Attaching a piece of glass with a slogan painted on the inside will require them to replace the whole window." In addition, The ALF Primer proposes that activists vandalize automobiles belonging to people employed in one of the areas of animal "exploitation" enumerated in the first paragraph of this profile. Calling motor vehicles "easy target[s]," the Primer explains: "Tires can be slashed. An ice pick, sharp knife, or anything of that sort will work. Tires, especially on trucks, are tougher than they seem, so use something thick and strong that wont [sic] break or bend. Putting a hole in the side wall will make it impossible to repair. A pair of pillars [sic, pliers] can also be used to yank out the stem (the thing you put air in through), which will also flatten the tire. A large screwdriver can damage a radiator by punching holes in it through the grill. If you cant [sic] get to the engine, you can cut wires and break various components. If you cant [sic] get to the engine, you can also cut what you can from underneath. Bring something heavy-duty like small bolt cutters, as regular wire cutters wont be able to handle metal cables and such. Either paint or paint stripper can do some damage to the paint job. Windshield wipers can be broke [sic] off, headlights and windshields smashed or painted with etching fluid, and locks glued." Beyond causing physical damage to the vehicle's exterior or to a component part such as a radiator, ALF also instructs its members on how to render an automobile completely unusable and, in most cases, irreparable: "The stereotypical sabotage technique is sugar in the gas tank. This will merely block the filter, and do little damage. More effective fuel tank additives are sand or 10 to 15 mothballs. . . . The best sabotage target is the lubricating system. If incapacitated, it will cause the engine to overheat, bind, and generally destroy itself. . . . One option for major damage is to carefully remove the oil, either by punching a hole in the oil pan, or removing the drain plug. Adding water to the oil is more effective, since it will not lubricate, but will keep the oil pressure up, keeping a warning light from coming on. Better than water is diesel or gasoline, as it will also break down existing oil. For maximum effect, look to adding abrasives to the lubricating system. . . . Other options for sabotage include dropping plaster of paris or a handful of BB's into the carburetor. A box of quick rice in the radiator will expand as the vehicle runs and clog the works. A pound of salt or some Drano will eat away the copper tubing of a radiator." The ALF Primer explains that "one of the quickest, easiest, and safest forms of direct action" is to insert glue into the locks on the doors of offending business establishments (butchers, restaurants, laboratories, etc.) - a procedure for which it gives detailed instructions - for the purpose of temporarily disrupting business activities and forcing the proprietors to pay locksmith expenses. It also recommends such schemes as: (a) spraying or splashing paint on the wood, metal, or stone exteriors of an alleged animal exploiter's place of business; (b) tying a weight to a strong rope, tossing it over the telephone line of the targeted business, and pulling it until the wire breaks; and (c) using the bathroom of a fast-food restaurant and clogging the toilet with a sponge. "If it [the sponge] gets deep into the pipes," says the Primer, ". . . this can turn into a very expensive problem. . . . A mixture of plaster and sawdust in a nylon stocking is another method." The ALF Primer further suggests that activists can effectively derail major construction projects of "abusive institution[s]" such as laboratories, steak houses, or leather shops. "During construction," the Primer notes, "survey stakes (wooden stakes with colored ribbons tied to the top) are used to mark such things as corners, water and sewer lines, and elevation. Simply removing these stakes and disguising the holes will cost a few days work. . . . More effective than removing stakes may be to move them just slightly. Although it may seem minor, removing survey stakes is considered a relatively major crime, so use the usual security precautions." The ALF Primer, which teaches readers how to make incendiary devices, calls arson "by far the most potent weapon of direct action." Sometimes the objective of arson is to damage or destroy an entire building. In other cases the goal is to create only a small fire "meant to give off heat, thus setting off a buildings sprinkler system, doing water damage to merchandise." "If using this method," the Primer counsels, "you should be using timed devices, set to go off at night when nobody is around. . . . Placing the device on the top floor is best, since the water from the sprinklers will then ideally run down to the other floors, doing damage on each." |
Copyright 2003-2005 : DiscoverTheNetwork.org