The Left Never Tires of Christian Bashing
By David Limbaugh
HUMAN EVENTS
Posted May 3, 2005
If I didn't know better, I would think liberal politicians
and columnists were out to prove the thesis of my book -- that there truly is a
war being waged against Christianity and Christians in the United States.
Oh, yes, they deny it and attempt to turn the tables, saying it's Christians
who are the belligerent ones, trying to take over the country and establish a
theocracy. If it's not the New York Times' Maureen Dowd, it's her
colleague Paul Krugman. If it's not them, it's John Kerry. They are all up in
arms about Christianity and its influence in politics, governance and the
public square.
What are these people so exercised about? Why must they insist on demonizing
Christians? Why do they fear them so? Why are they so paranoid about them
participating in politics and government? Why do they seem to think that only
Christians must keep their views to themselves once they are elected to office?
Failed presidential candidate John Kerry said, "I am sick and tired of a
bunch of people trying to tell me that God wants a bunch of conservative judges
on the court." Just for the record, Senator Kerry, conservatives and
Christian conservatives aren't saying they want conservative judges on the
court, but originalists: judges who will interpret the Constitution according
to the Framers' original intent.
The war against Christians has intensified with the recent controversy over
ending the Democrats' (nearly) unprecedented filibustering of judicial
nominees. Senate Democrats and their enablers apparently see the Christian
right as the main bogeyman in the effort to restore majority rule to the
judicial confirmation process.
They are especially upset with Senate majority leader Bill Frist for agreeing
to participate in "Justice Sunday," an event organized by Christian
groups to rally Christians to support politicians trying to end the judicial
filibuster. Frist's opponents, from Ralph Neas, president of the People for the
American Way, to junior Senator Mark Pryor, have registered disgust that
Christian politicians and Christian groups would presume to approach this issue
from the perspective of their Christian worldview.
Before the judicial filibuster flap, it was the Terri Schiavo case. During that
acrimonious, national debate, Dowd accused Christian conservatives of trying to
establish a theocracy. Actually, she said, "Oh, my God, we really are in a
theocracy." She also paid homage to the "credo" that "a
person's relationship with God should remain a private matter." And, she
compared Christian conservatives to Muslim "religious
fundamentalists" in Iraq.
Krugman, similarly, compared Christian "extremists" in America to
"religious extremists" in Israel who "have already killed one
prime minister." In fairness, Krugman said such assassinations aren't
occurring here yet, but "unless moderates take a stand against the growing
power of domestic extremists, it can happen here."
Dowd's suggestion that we have a theocracy isn't serious enough to warrant a
rebuttal. Most Christians I know are radically opposed to theocracy, which is
antithetical to religious freedom, a principle at the apex of their priorities.
But Dowd's wrongheaded notion that "a person's relationship with God
should be a private matter," needs to be vigorously challenged.
If Christians are to honor Christ's Great Commission of spreading the Gospel to
all nations, they must engage in the political arena and governance if for no
other reason than that the Gospel cannot flourish as well in the absence of
political and religious liberty. Christians have a duty to be involved to
promote liberty.
Where did we get this crazy idea that Christians can't base their support and
opposition of candidates, issues and even laws on Christian morality? Dowd's
specious assertion ignores that the overwhelming majority of our Founding
Fathers formed this government on Christian principles. Most of our laws, civil
and criminal -- from trespassing, to stealing, assault, rape and murder -- are
grounded in morality, and it is an astonishing deception to suggest otherwise.
This idea that Christians must keep their views to themselves, and that
politicians must keep their Christian worldview in a lockbox has caught on even
among many Christians. But a Christian inhibits his Christian walk if he places
his religion on just one "shelf" of his life. His worldview must
inform his politics, just as everyone else's does.
What the secular Left wants to do is marginalize Christian conservatives by
suggesting they are hell-bent on reserving religious liberty (and presumably
other types of freedom) only for themselves.
But all we have to do to refute that lie is to point to the history of this
great nation, which owes its freedom largely to the religious liberties
enshrined in the Constitution by Christians. The Left will never tire of
castigating Christians, so we might as well get used to that. But in the
meantime, it is important that Christians be neither duped nor intimidated from
participating aggressively in politics and governance, which is their sacred
right and their unquestionable duty.
Copyright © 2004 HUMAN
EVENTS. All Rights Reserved.![]()