|
|
|
|
PBS's NewsHour Acknowledges Pro-Obama Bias in Campaign '08 By Media Research Center July 29, 2008 Barack Obama's overseas trip has garnered an incredibly large amount of media attention, especially with the three broadcast network anchors going along for the ride. But lately, some are beginning to recognize the "Obamania" present within the mainstream media, including members of the media themselves. On the Friday, July 25 edition of PBS's News Hour with Jim Lehrer, PBS joined in on the acknowledgment that media coverage of Obama has been unprecedented and overwhelming as Senior Correspondent Judy Woodruff discussed the media coverage of John McCain and Barack Obama with Andrew Tyndall, publisher of the Tyndall Report, and Tom Rosenstiel, director of the Project for Excellence in Journalism. Before the guests appeared, Woodruff recounted the media attention given to Obama's overseas trip, noting that the press corps following Obama was "larger than usual" and that late night comics had even poked fun at the adoration members of the media have shown for Obama. Rosenstiel, responding to a request by Woodruff to size up the coverage of Obama's trip, observed: "This is more akin to a presidential trip than a candidate trip." [This item, by MRC intern Lyndsi Thomas, was posted Monday on the MRC's blog, NewsBusters.org: newsbusters.org ] Andrew Tyndall then chimed in and contended that the broadcast network anchors following Obama smelled of a coronation: "Well, the thing I think that really emphasizes Tom's point about it being treated as a head-of-state trip rather than a candidate trip was the extraordinary decision by the broadcast networks to send their anchors along to interview him on the way. It's entirely unprecedented that a premier candidate should be treated with this type of coverage. That really is reserved for heads of state. And even though I think the tone of the interviewing was actually really quite hard-edged by all three anchors, the fact that they sort of dignified this trip with their presence had a little smell of a coronation about it really before the election has actually happened." Following up on this, Woodruff asked if it was a mistake for the three broadcast network anchors to follow Obama. Tyndall concurred, asserting, "The regular campaign correspondents could have covered it perfectly well and taken care of all the journalistic business that needed to be taken care of." Reiterating the findings of a recent Project for Excellence in Journalism study, Rosenstiel also explained that Obama has received significantly more coverage than John McCain and, accordingly, the media have given Obama an advantage: In response to a probe by Woodruff about the responsibility of journalists to equalize coverage of the two candidates, Rosenstiel argued that even if Obama is more newsworthy than McCain, the media must be careful to not tilt the situation in favor of Obama: And, ending the segment on the note that Obama is getting unprecedented treatment by the media, Tyndall declared: "The phenomenon that we're talking about here is not that McCain is being ignored, that he's not able to get his word out in the mainstream media. It's that this thing, Barack Obama, is head and shoulders a different category of treatment of a candidate that we've ever seen before. So it's not that McCain is getting the short end of the stick. It's that -- you know, Obama is not getting a stick. He's getting a different category. He's getting a log, not a stick." To read the entire transcript of the segment: www.pbs.org |
Copyright 2003-2006 : DiscoverTheNetwork.org