Nowhere in the Constitution does it state one must respect another person's

religion. The Constitution implies that one must respect another person's right to practice their religion. Unfortunately religious leaders, educators, politicians, and journalists confuse this fundamental difference and Muslim leaders and organizations such as the Council on American Islamic Relations (CAIR) have taken advantage of the ignorance of Americans. Muslim activists have succeeded in blurring this distinction. Through persistent intimidation, they demand that everyone respect Islam and silence anyone who criticizes Islam. They will continue to flex their muscles.

The Organization of Islamic Conference (OIC), composed of 57 Muslim

countries, effected this fundamental change in the United Nations. The OIC

formulated a resolution that Islam be protected from “defamation” even if

factual. On April 12, 2005, the United Nations Commission on Human Rights

passed a resolution by the vote of 31 to 16 that promotes “respect for all

religions and their value system” superceding “respect for human rights”.

Accordingly, accusing Islam of violating human rights is in itself an act of

defamation of Islam.

This indoctrination is being drummed into the American psyche. For example,

CAIR has demanded a Manhattan college to investigate how a paperback copy of

the Quran from the campus library ended up in a public toilet and that the

incident be treated as a possible hate crime even before any facts are

known. This is part of a continued campaign to condition Americans that it

is a crime to disrespect Islam and the Quran.

The world’s leading online search engine, Google, now considers the critique

of Islam as ‘hate speech’ and have removed sites referencing such

journalists and columnist as Michelle Malkin and Arlene Peck. Universities

are nullifying invitations to speakers such as Daniel Pipes, Bridgette

Gabriel, Nonie Darwish and Walid Shoebat, experts on Islamic culture and

radical Islamic organizations for fear of Muslim protests and boycotts. In

Congress, John Conyers, democratic representative from Michigan has

sponsored the House Resolution 288, apparently seeking to criminalize

criticism of Islam.

Muslim activists understand our Jeffersonian Constitution better than

non-Muslim Americans. They display no compunction in defaming other beliefs

and those who are members of other faiths. Muslim activists and

representatives of Muslim organizations have deliberately falsified and

distorted comments made by critics of Islam in order to discredit them as

has been the case with Robert Spencer, an expert on Islam. Using the

American judicial system, CAIR has sued individuals, i.e. Andy Whitehead for

exposing their radical connections to Hamas without success, although

costing thousands of dollars to him and his lawyers for his defense. CAIR

threatened to sue Sharon Chadha, an investigative reporter, on grounds of

“harassment” for only requesting information linking financial support from

the UAE and Saudi Arabia.

As ominous, is the precedence that has been set into motion. Muslims demand

the right to practice their religion even though it infringes on someone

else’s civil rights. It is now permissible to discriminate against a

population when it offends the sensibilities of Muslims. In Minnesota,

Muslims have the right as taxi cab drivers not to service individuals who

are in possession of alcohol. When will it be considered a right for these

drivers to deny blind passengers with seeing-eye dogs because their dogs are

considered unclean, as is presently occurring in the United Kingdom? And

just this past week, it was reported that six imams were removed from a US

Airways flight. By all accounts, the passengers and crew were vigilant and

recognized problematic conduct that was perceived as a threat to their

lives. The imams were asked to disembark. They were not singled out because

they were Muslims but because their actions and behavior posed a security

risk. Subsequently, they claimed they were “harassed” and profiled for

being Muslims, and summoned Muslims to boycott the airline. CAIR is

demanding that Muslims be granted special civil rights protection. This

flies in the face of common sense. Since the 9/11 carnage, all Americans

are inconvenienced every day in office buildings, shopping malls,

educational institutions, airports, etc. And now John Conyers wants to enact

a law that gives preference to Muslims.

The second part of the First Amendment is just as meaningful. The

Constitution endorses the right to congregate and disagree peaceably: no

threatening, no incitement, no rioting, and no killing.

Currently, we are witnessing a breakdown of these Constitutional

protections.

Individuals are physically threatened not for telling untruths but for

exposing the inconvenient and uncomfortable truths about Islam: its history,

culture, the Quran, its founders and leaders.

Political correctness has gone berserk. Americans are not permitted to find

fault with Islam. We have to keep telling ourselves that like all religions,

Islam must be a ‘religion of peace’. And it must be that only a few fanatics

have hijacked the religion.

The cliché “ignorance is bliss” amply applies to our leaders who fantasize

what they would like Islam to be, not what it is. Our leaders will believe

almost anything that is told to them that fosters this belief. And financial

and political incentives can convince even the doubters. Deny history and

ignore the obvious is a better alternative to state the facts and be harmed.

If Americans continue to be afraid to criticize anything related to Islam,

and Americans surrender to Muslim empowerment, then we are all doomed to a

life of censorship, propaganda, indoctrination and intimidation. And it is

only one step away from Sharia laws of blasphemy and discrimination being

enforced.

CALLING ALL ATTORNEYS!

U.S. citizens for the past thirty years have become victims of international

Islamic terrorism. They have been empowered to use the civil courts to

obtain a semblance of justice and to obtain judgments that become a form of

economic sanctions against governments that support terrorism. This

unconventional approach has been accepted as an effective method in fighting

terrorism; it deprives terrorists of their financial resources and disrupts

their capabilities.

Attorneys have been successful in obtaining billions of dollars in judgments

on behalf of the families of victims and victims of Islamic terrorism, and

hundreds of millions of dollars have been collected.

Today, attorneys are needed to represent individuals and defend and fight

for Western values in a new Islamic form of terrorism, a cultural and legal

jihad taking place in the United States. This is a matter of our survival

and life as we know it.

Since 9/11, although our homeland security has improved, our politicians and

academicians have undermined our ability to recognize Islam, a totalitarian

belief system, as being antithesis to Western values. Radical Muslims have

gained a foothold in Muslim communities and are erecting legal barriers

that will prevent gathering of intelligence that will thwart another attack.

Radical Islamic Organizations that masquerade as moderate civil rights

organizations or Islamic ‘charities’ give support to Hamas, Hezballah, and

Al Qaeda, movements the U.S. government considers criminal and subversive.

Government representatives and politicians have a duty to condemn

demonstrations and financial support for Hezballah and Hamas. Our

Congressmen are silent on this issue. One particular congressman is

determined to enact laws that give special privileges to Muslims and prevent

law enforcement agents from investigating Islamic communities that harbor

terrorist and Islamic ‘charities’ and individuals that support Islamic

terrorism.

Eighty percent of mosques in the United States are under Saudi Wahabi

influence, an extreme form of Islam that supports bigotry against all

non-muslims and encourages replacing the Constitution with Sharia law.

The Counsel for American Islamic Relations (CAIR), a radical Islamic

organization with a proven association with Hamas, and Muslim activists

have threatened and brought civil actions against 1) authors who have

identified Muslims who have supported terrorist groups, 2) investigative

reporters who have requested information exposing CAIR's financial

relationship to Saudi Arabia, UAE and other terrorist supporting

organizations, and 3) talk-show hosts and columnist who are critical of

Islam.

Authors, columnists, and journalists whose writings and discussions are

critical of Islam are being censored. They are not even allowed to cite

passages from the Quran. Islamic organizations and Muslim activists are

using a novel tactic to suppress this criticism. They have targeted Google

and pressured the search engine to place these authors and their writings in

the category of "Hate Speech". Sites referencing their names have been

removed.

Muslims are demanding special treatment and accommodations in schools,

offices, public facilities, private gyms and airports and are bringing legal

actions for alleged discrimination and civil rights violations.

Universities throughout the United States propagate an anti-Israel and

pro-Palestinian agenda. Professors and Imams, especially in the Middle

Eastern Studies programs, believe it is their right to indoctrinate

students. Rumors, unsubstantiated reports, fabrications, historical

distortions and myths are being taught as facts. Students who are informedws

and question the veracity of the statements, and submit papers that provide

evidence to the contrary are penalized through ad homonem attacks and lower

grades. Although it is considered a right to burn the American flag,

Universities have passed resolutions making it a crime to desecrate flags of

Hamas and Hezballah.

Only through civil actions can this practice of intimidation and

Islamization of America be forestalled. Attorneys must represent individuals

and organizations who have been unfairly and fraudulently accused of hate

speech, for abusive claims of violating civil rights and for not providing

special accommodations.

Legal actions must be brought against Islamic Centers, Mosques, Islamic

schools and community leaders that incite hatred against non-Muslims and

Islamic ‘charities’ that raise funds for terrorist organizations.

Academic institutions must be held to a higher standard and civil actions

must be brought against these institutions for promulgating a hostile

environment, and discriminating against students. Attorneys must commit

themselves to represent students who are harassed and penalized for

correcting their teachers on inaccuracies and for being pro-Israel.

This proclamation is a call to all attorneys who recognize that America and

its institutions are under attack physically, culturally and politically. It

is time to defend those individual who have been falsely accused of

discrimination and bigotry, put educational institutions on notice that they

cannot claim that propaganda is an “alternative truth”, hold companies

culpable for irresponsibly caving-in to bullying actions, and bankrupt those

Islamic institutions that support terrorism.

Muslim radicals will continue to be emboldened to enact religious intolerance laws for Muslims only. It is imperative that the legal profession prevent the introduction of such legislation which will weaken America's capability to protect itself and its citizens.