|
|
|
|
Boxer's Outrageous Attack on Condi Rice By Robert B. Bluey January 12, 2007 Sen. Barbara Boxer's personal attack on Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice yesterday at a Senate hearing is prompting calls for an apology today. The White House is leading the charge, calling the remarks "outrageous." Boxer's statement to Rice came during testimony about President Bush's new plan for Iraq. Boxer, according to the Fox News, said this to Rice: Who pays the price? I'm not going to pay a personal price. My kids are too old and my grandchild is too young. You're not going to pay a particular price, as I understand it, with an immediate family. So who pays the price? The American military and their families. My colleagues Ivy Sellers and Amanda Carpenter tell me that during an event at The Heritage Foundation today, Heritage vice president Becky Norton Dunlop spoke to the audience about Boxer's audacity. Rebecca Hagelin, a vice president of The Heritage Foundation, summed it up for me this way: If you can't attack on substance, attack the person -- it's been a staple of liberal tactics. But Barbara Boxer's outrageous attack on Condi Rice hit a new low - even for Boxer. What does Condoleezza Rice's personal life have to do with the war in Iraq? Nothing. The unmistakable message Boxer sent all Americans is that if you are single or childless, you have no stake in public policy -- that you're something less than fully American. Boxer owes an apology -- not just to Secretary Rice -- but to the millions of other singles and adults in this nation who don't have children. Word around Washington is that other conservatives will soon be offering their own denunciations of Boxer -- and demands for an apology. UPDATE -- 4:34 p.m.: The Independent Women's Forum is all over the Boxer story. Writing on IWF's InkWell blog, Carrie Lukas says this: This is a tactic often employed by the Left and particularly radical feminists: men are often demeaned unfit to comment on issues such as reproduction issues or childcare that most directly affect women. It’s simple prejudice, of course, and as is often the case, the media let’s such inappropriate remarks slide when they come from Democrats. The New York Post suggests imagining the uproar that would have ensured if it was a Republican -- or even worse, a male Republican -- making such snide remarks to a Democrat. It would be page one news. Candace de Russy, also writing at InkWell, says the National Organization for Women isn't responding to its calls seeking a comment. UPDATE -- 5:03 p.m.: The Independent Women's Forum is keeping the heat on Boxer. Here's a press release that just went out: For Immediate Release: UPDATE -- 5:14 p.m.: Apparently, NOW isn't ready to comment on Boxer's harsh words, according to Amanda Carpenter, who just spoke to someone there. |
Copyright 2003-2006 : DiscoverTheNetwork.org